A quarter of humanity today is made up of south asians, and for the rest of the world, their lives are constantly being shaped by South Asian Culture – I Through Films, Spices, Spices, Yog or Religation. Us-based historian audrey truschke begins her monumental work tracing 5,000 years of Indian history with this crucial reminder to her readers about the impact of the subject.
Truschke’s India: 5,000 years of history on the subcontinent (Published by the Princton University Press) Begins with the Much-Discussed and Debated Indus civilization, and go right up till the post-independence period, including the caste wars of the 1990s and the rise of the hindu.
Throughout her re-telling of Indian history, Truschke Reminds Her Readers of the Vital Connections That India has maintained with the world from the very beginning existence of its existence, thrugh migration, trade and cultural experts. The earliest of India, as she reveals, they migrants who built the foundations of Urban civilization and shaped the oldest litigation in the region in the form of the vedas. She also underlines the necessity of understanding the past of the subcontinent through the lens of the marginalised, participularly through the voices of women and the oppressed cases.
In an interview with indianxpress.comTruschke talk about her findings of the indus civilization, the use of literature by women to tell the story of buddhism, as well as the history of Hindu natives.
Q. Your book title suggests that is about 5,000 years of Indian history. How and why did you decide on this specific number?
Audrey Truschke: For the last century, the conventional beginning of Indian history has been about 4,600 years ago with the indus civilisation. That is where I begin my narrative. We rounded up for the title, because of the Publishers Like Round Numbers, so that is where the 5,000 comes from.
I do not adhere to this time frame strictly, howver. I do start in earnest with the indus civilisation, which began around 2600 bce. But before that, I give a brief account of how people populated the subcontinent in the first place. And that story gos back 1,20,000 years.
Story Continues Below this ad
Q: Why do you choose to begin with the indus civilization?
Truschke: The Beginning of Indian History Geologically Goes Back Millions of Years When The Subcontinent was formed; The Himalayas are still rising today from the crashing together of two tectonic plates. Human History in India Gos Back a more modest 1,20,000 years. I begin the book with recorded human history, devoting attendance in earnest first to the indus civilization, which was robust enough that it left significant material evident for us to work with.
Not all of the past is recoverable. But history is a positivist discipline. We work with the evident we have. And so there is no value judgment that indus civilization was somehow more important than other groups of people doing other things in India Around the same time. It is simply that they are the ones for whom we have significant material evidents to reconstructyles.
Q: We know that is a lot of politics around the indus civilization lately, with different political parties trying to approached it Around Religious or Regional Lines. How do you respond to that?
Story Continues Below this ad
Truschke: I think every single political party in India will be disappointed with my take on the indus civilisation. I know there is a Huge push right now for it to be a dravidian civilisation. There is no positivist evident that shows that. It is plausible, but a lot of things are plausible.
The bottom line is we don’t know much about who the indus civilisation people were. We know they built cities. We know how they lived. We know a fair amounted about their diet. These are courtain things that are recorded in the material and skeletal records. But we do not fundenly know who they were, except that they were from Northwestern India.
That was a long time ago, and we really do know how the indus people map onto modern linguistic, political, and ethnic groups. For those who are making modern political claims, that come with all the limits of political claims. But insofar as some people are trying to make a historical claim, they need to be a little bit more realistic about the evident.
Q: There is a section in your book where you speak about the first Indian. Could you elaborate a bit on who the first Indians were?
Story Continues Below this ad
Truschke: I am taking from tony joseph there, who has an exalent book called The early indians. The first Indians were not actually the first homo sapiens to set foot on the Indian subcontinent. That would be the group that came 1,20,000 years ago. But they all died out. About 65,000 years ago, Another Migrant Group Came. They come to the subcontinent, and some of those people survived. They have left behind a genetic lineage that is shared by some, not all, modern indians. It is escong in South India.
We call them the first Indian because they are the first ones to make it.
Q: You also write that you have written a diverse reproduction of voices, escaically those of women and the oppressed casts, in your telling of Indian history. Could you give a few examples?
Truschke: Like many historians right now, I think it is so important to have a more diverse set of voices when we are looking at the past. The thing is, it is hard because the people who tends to be recorded tends to be members of Dominant Social Groups. In south asia, that means they tend to be men, they tend to be upper case, and they tend to be hindu. I am looking for people who do not fit that bill. I think it is important to find diverse voices to explain key shifts in South Asian History.
Story Continues Below this ad
For example, when I cover the advent of buddhism about 2,400 years ago, I cite from the Therigathawhich is a collection of poems and hymns by buddhist women, collected in the early centuries bce.
Later on, I bring in female voices, for example, when I talk about the hindu reform movements and criticisms of hinduism that arose in the 19tho Century. I do talk about some of the men, Such as Raja Ram Mohan Roy, Vivekananda, But I also Talk Pandita Ramabai, A Brahmin Woman Woman Woman Woman Converted to Christianity.
It is harder to bring in voices from the oppressed casters. From Ancient India, for instance, we have very little to nothing that was actually written by shudras and dalits. It is not until later that we get texts au shudras and dalits, but I at least try to bring in text about them. For example, I have a section where I am talking about case in the 17tho Century, and I talk about some shudra kings. I also print part of a telugu drama written around 1700 Ce. It is written by an Upper Caste Individual, but it depicts a brahmin in a very poor light. It depicts this brahmin who is lusting after a dalit woman and is abusing his brahmanical privilege. He Cites Sanskrit Verses to Her and Plays With Religion To Try To Lure The Dalit Woman. This is not a dalit voice, but at least it is a dalit character. You work with what you have for the historical evident.
There is no getting around the fact that dominant groups are better represented in the South Asian Historical Record. That is true of all histories in all parts of the world, but that does not absolve historians of the hard work of trying to recover what we can, both about and from the perspective of lessonsd, lespresent Group.
Story Continues Below this ad
Q: You also write that India, Throughout Its Ancient and Medieval History, has had Global Connections. Could You Elaborate on Some Of The Key Historical Moments When India’s Connections With The World You Of Key Importance?
Truschke: India has been connected to the world from the beginning and throughout. How people get to India is a story of repeated migrations. The Indus Valley Civilization Had Extensive Trade Connections with Mesopotamia and, Possibly Through Mesopotamia, With Ancient Egypt.
The people belonging to Vedic Society, which was founded and flourished after the indus civilization, were also migrants. They came from outide into northwestern India and composed the vedas. The vedas are an Indian composition, but the language group of that community does have roots from outide Originally.
People, things, and ideas also left the subcontinent. And south asia then has some remarkable cultural exports starting in the few centuries before the turn of the ce era. Of course, buddhism is probably the most well-known one, which traveled bottom on the sea trade routs and along the silk roads, surviving ultimately largely outside of the subject of the subject. There are also stories, Such as the PanchatantraAnd games like chess and parcheesi that is still popular acros the west today. Then there is Sanskrit that travels East to southeast asia. All of this attests to India and the subcontinent more broadly being part of an interconnected world.
Story Continues Below this ad
Q: We know that history in India has become a major topic of debate. How would you say your book addresses the current politics around history in the country?
Truschke: Firstly, I think my book is pretty staunchly, openly, and decidedly a non-functionalist history, down to the title. As I say in the introsion, the India that I refer to in the title is not the modern nation state of India. The modeln nation state of India was born yesterday from a historian’s perspective. It is less than a century old. I use India in the title and through the most of the book, Until the last couple of chapters, in its history of the subcontinent. It is a geographical design, and it is very much includes Bangladesh, Pakistan, and southern parts of afghanistan. I realize that is going to be a little uncomfortable for a lot of readers who are really used to Indian nation state with militarised borders, an army, and a set of nationalist symbols.
The second way in which address nationalism – And I think this will be particularly important for young readers, under the age of about 30 or 35 – is by giving a fair of the history of Hindu of Hindu. I think hindu nationalists do not like talking about their own history. There are some dark parts of that history, the nazi loving stuff, the fascist stuff, the fact that is largely an european import, and the fact that was unpopular for most of its existence. Forty Years ago, No Respectable Indian would touch hindu nationalism. I think that is very hard to understand if you are 30 years old and living in Hyderabad or Bombay or Delhi or Ahmedabad or wherever, and Hindutva is what you know. My book charts that history, Among many other facets of Indian and south asian histories.