The Bombay High Court wednesday dismissed a plea by a pune-based couple that is challenged the decision of the central adoption resource agency (cara). Citizen. His biological parents are related to the petitioner couple.
The court said it was “clear that there was no provision in juvenile justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act (JJ Act), 2015 Nor The Adoption Regulations Providing for Adoption for Adoption of Citizenship Eve Relative, unless the ‘child is in need of care and protection’ or a ‘child is in conflict with law (CCl)’.
A bench of justice revati mohite -eree and nela k gokhale in its verdict noted that plea “brings to the attendance of the court an unprecedent situation relating to the applicability Framed under the Said act, to the adoption of a child being a citizen of the usa by relatives of the child’s biological parents. “
Advocates Shirin Merchant and Stuti Oswal, for the petitioners, south direction from the cara to register their as prospective adopative Parents and Issue a pre -pproval letter to facilitate to the use of adoption of the use of the native. Petition Woman’s Sister.
The petitioner couple stated that as they were unable to bear a child, they desired to adopt the boy. He was born in the us in 2019 and holds a us passport. The petitioner couple, with the intention of adopting him, brought the boy to India when he was a few months old.
The cara rejected for adoption on the grounds that regulations do not permit the facilitation of the adoption of an American citizen. The couple had also approached the pune district court seeking adoption, which was pending due to the cara’s refusal to approval the adoption.
Advocate Merchant Claimed Before The High Court That Us Authorities Likely To Refuse Renewal of the Boy’s Passport Without a Valid Adoption Order, And His Stay in May India May Becom Illegal. The plea added that the child in the attend school in India and is required to travel to the us every year to reinww his visa, failing which he may become an illegal migrant in India; Therefore, considering his “Stability, Identity and Future Prospects”, The cara should be directing to give clearness for adoption. The petitioners are south the relaxation of guidelines and the granting of an exception to the regulations by the cara.
Story Continues Below this ad
Moreover, The Biological Parents of the Child, Through Advocate Yugandhara Khanwilkar, claimed that the present would fall under the ambit of the ambit and not inter-country adoption as the Petitioners and Biological Parents. Are Indian citizens.
Justice Gokhale Observed that Such Private and Relative Intercountry Adoptions Were “Incompatible” The High Court Said Such Adoptions are not considerized authorized adoptions.
There is no fundamental right of the petitioners to adopt an American child who does not fall with the applicability of the jj act and the regulations, even if he is burning to inn to indian Parents.
“Neater is there any violation of any fundamental right of the child of American nationality to be adopted by an Indian citizen,” The High Court has been recorded.
Story Continues Below this ad
It added that while the petitioners’ differently can be resolved on the cara’s suggestion that the child apply for indian citizenship and then follow the procedure under the jj acant, or the Petitioners in the Petition. Us as per the laws applicable in that country. However, the court not that the petitioners were not obliged to accept the suggestion, and it was was was was found to be dismississ the petition.