“The Founding Fathers of Our Constitution and Of Our Country Had Intended Indian Society to Be Secular and Socialist. They are not new definitions. Incorporate them in the constitution itself for they will be mentioned there rightly, “Indira Told the Lok Sabha.

Recently, RSS General Secretaryya Hosabale South a Discussion on Whaler “Socialist” and “Secular” Should Continue to Remain in the Premble. Union ministers shivraj singh chouhan and jitendra single “Socialist” and “Secular” in the Premble.

The 42nd Constitutional Amendment was passed with a special majority by bot in 1977, when the Janata party government came to power after winning the lok sabha pols, it revised almost alm. Brought into for one’s steill retaining “Socialist” and “Secular” and Fundamental Duties.

With the opposition Members in Prison, the 42nd Constitutional Amendment Got Widespread Support in the House, GV Mavalankar.

PG Mavalankar, who was not arrested because of the stature of his family, also criticized the emergency. “I am ask: are there condoms to a free debate today? Is there a free press? Is the public forum in continuous and free possession of the people? And opinions are obviously and the publicity has been eternal; Questioning How Free The Debate on the Constitutional Amendment Bill Could Be.

“Through my life, I have been wedded to socialist and Secular Ideals,” Mavalankar Said on the insurance of the two terms, “but I want to ask you: can we change the whole whiche That was particularly mentioned in the preamble which says: ‘We the people of India etc?’ The preamble is not strictly; Say: Democracy is the Substance;

Notwithstanding this dissent, the change of support from the entry house, mainly the treasury bench ms.

“The objectives which we had always in view, namely, socialism and secularism, which have tried to implement, will be more and more implemented and corrected and corrected in a Basic part. Our constitution, namely, the preamble, ”then union law minister hr gokhale said. “Let anyone say that ‘socialism’ or ‘secularism’ is incapable of definition. Well, if that argument was accepted, even ‘democracy’ in this sense is inacpable of definition care, its in. Different Countries?

CPI Leader Indrajit Gupta Said, “It is very welcome also that word ‘secular’ is being introduced. We want to understand what is the significance behind this. And recognizes, and gives equals Rights to people belonging to all relighes or faiths or to people of no relief, in law. “

Indrajit Gupta Also Said: “When the government itself has come forward to add the word ‘secular’, Particularly here, I take it to me something; To be strengted; Take Some Further Action, Legislative and others, to strengthen and secularise the content of our democracy. ”

Supporting the bill, congress mp pr shenoy dismissed as emotional the concern that sweeping changes were made to the constitution, with opposition ms in prison. “Cartain events in the country have made it necessary to lay Emphasis on Certain Concepts Like Nationalism and Secularism…. Who are under detention and men who are not doing not expressing their views as long as there is emervancy – not that they are not allowed to express their views but they do not know do not expresses. Men will be the same Objection, I am a senior nature.

Then union minister swaran singh said that is the inclusion of the word secular was “Very vital for our country to grow from strength to strength and to have made a strong nation”. He added that the word had become very popular acros India. “You may go to the punjab, to Gujarat, even to the south; when they make speechles in their own languages ​​they always use the word ‘secret’ it has a definite meaning and that meaning is three. Before the eye in our constitution with regarding differences. Religions. ”

Taking a dig at the jana sangh, congress mp cm steephen said, “There are people who are speaking about communal authority. It is the name of the nation that is not going from the name of the nation; Constitution reflects the new found faith and the belief, community and promises which they are giving to themslves. ” He added that this was the same constitution that was given to the people in 1949, but with a few amendments.